Legal Opinion

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Helix Subsea Construction, Inc., and Helix Well Ops Inc. v. Matthew Howard

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 13, 2014No. 14-14-00442-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 13, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00442-CV HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., HELIX SUBSEA CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND HELIX WELL OPS INC., Appellants V. MATTHEW HOWARD, Appellee On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-67699 CONCURRING OPINION I join Justice Christopher’s majority opinion for the Court in full. I write separately to provide further explanation for my conclusion that expedited court determination of maintenance and cure is a procedural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re GlobalSanteFe Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ralph Hall v. Diamond M CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API