Legal Opinion

Vonador v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 10, 2003No. 2D03-2143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Mark A. Vonador challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Vonador presented a facially sufficient claim that his habitual offender sentence is illegal, which claim was not refuted by the trial court’s order, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

According to Vonador’s motion, he was convicted of armed robbery with a firearm for an offense committed in May 1992 and was sentenced as a habitual offender to thirty years in prison with a three-year minimum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. State v. J.M.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Baxter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Gahley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Burgess v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  3. Roca v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API