Legal Opinion

Meltzer v. Blumberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The second mortgagee defends the foreclosure of a first mortgage solely upon the ground that it has been reduced by the payment of a sum by an insurance company under a fire policy. The plaintiff became the holder of the first mortgage by assignment from the Lawyers Mortgage Company, dated May 27, 1927. The mortgage was placed on the property in 1909. After that mortgage was made the property was sold to the answering defendant Horn*234berger, and later she sold it to a party named Goldstein, taking back a second mortgage, dated May 29, 1924. The second mortgage states that it is subject to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sherman v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Waring v. . LoderNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Foster v. . Van ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Ulster County Savings Institution v. LeakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Gordon v. Ware Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. RyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Walton v. GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API