Legal Opinion

State v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2011No. 08051338C; A140036Published

1Per curiam

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case, State v. Hartman, 238 Or App 582, 243 P3d 480 (2010), arguing that this court erred in its disposition of the case. In our original opinion, we reversed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, and, consequently, we reversed and remanded the case. The state points out that the evidence at issue in defendant’s motion concerned only two of the seven counts of which defendant was convicted and, thus, our disposition properly should have been to affirm defendant’s convictions on the counts not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API