Rizzi v. Blue Cross of Southern California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Anthony Rizzi appeals a summary judgment for Blue Cross of Southern California (Blue Cross) after the trial court concluded Rizzi’s complaint—alleging, inter alia, violations of California Insurance Code section 790.03 in the denial of his claim for medical benefits under his employer’s group insurance policy—was preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA; see 29 U.S.C. 1 § 1001 et seq.). We affirm the judgment because we conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding the group insurance program was an employee welfare benefit plan…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America v. AngoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Marshall v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- International Association of Entrepreneurs of America v. AngoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Robertson v. Gem Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.