Legal Opinion

Raich v. Martha A. Gottfried, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 1988No. 87-1527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm, and find no error by the trial court in concluding, based upon the evidence presented at trial, that the appellee real estate broker was entitled to the amount of the commission provided for in the exclusive listing agreement as damages, when the appellants, owners of the property, agreed to sell the property to a third party during the term of the listing agreement. Cf. Whitehurst v. Erstling, 184 So.2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). The trial court found that the appellants intentionally failed to refer the ultimate purchasers to the appellee broker as required by the terms of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitehurst v. ErstlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Florida Realty & Auction Co. v. PeacockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API