Legal Opinion
Luckhardt v. Pardieck
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 13, 1962No. 2988PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
After the entry of a final decree of foreclosure in favor of the appellees, who were plaintiffs below, the defendants, appellants here, filed their motion in the trial court for an order fixing the amount and conditions of a supersedeas bond as authorized by Florida Appellate Rule 5.5, 31 F.S.A., and Section 59.13(1), Florida Statutes, F. S.A. After hearing, the court fixed the amount of the bond “conditioned to pay costs on appeal, legal interest, attorneys fees, and damages for delay.” The authority for fixing the terms and conditions of a supersedeas bond is set forth in Florida Appellate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernstein v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- A. D. Lawson & Columbia Casualty Co. v. County Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Larson v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Kahn v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- City of Miami v. HuttoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sholkoff v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Ohio Rlty. Inv. Corp. v. Southern Bk. of W. Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- John T. Wood Homes, Inc. v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Empress Homes, Inc. v. LevinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Atlantic National Bank of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.