Woodstock Bank v. Lamson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from the court of chancery. A petition for foreclosure was brought against the defendant Hubbard, who was a subsequent mortgagee, and the other defendants who claimed under him. The bill wap .taken as confessed with right to be heard upon the subject of damages. The facts stated in the bill are fully given in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The petitioner is assignee of a mortgage executed by Samuel E. Robbins and Richard S. Lawrence to Charles C. Little on the 30th July, 1849. .This mortgage convoyed certain real estate in Windsor; and was foreclosed .by á decree in favor of Julius Converse against the mortgagors and certain other parties, at the term of the court of' chancery held in this county in December, 1857, — Mr.Converse being then the assignee of the mortgage, but holding it for the use and bénefit of the petitioner. At the time when this decree of foreclosure was made, the defendant Hubbard held another mortgage,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lovell v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1831
3Cited by2 opinions
- Calkins v. ClementSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Devereaux & Meserve v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880