Legal Opinion
DITTMER v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1968No. 20368PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrime, J.
This is an action for an injunction by the Appellants to enjoin the Appellee, City of Indianapolis, from taking bids, letting contracts, or proceeding with the construction of a sanitary sewer known as PIN 70, or making any assessments for the costs thereof against any of the Appellants or any property affected by the sewer.
A hearing was held as provided by law at which time evidence was submitted by both sides on the issue.
The controlling Statutes are:
Construction of Sewer — Burns’ Indiana Statutes 48-4001
Hearing — Burns’ Indiana Statutes 48-4002
Notice —Burns’ Indiana Statutes 48-4005
At the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson, Admx. v. RollingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Edwards v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Johnson v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Bottema v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike Ex Rel. MinnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re the Estate of CassnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Indianapolis v. NickelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ray v. State Election BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Skiles v. Marion County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980