Legal Opinion
Timothy Keeton v. State of Oklahoma and Larry Fields
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1994No. 94-6011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the brief and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Timothy Keeton, a prisoner in an Oklahoma state prison, filed a pro se civil rights complaint against the Appellees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The gist of his complaint was that the Oklahoma Prison Overcrowding Emergency Powers Act (“Act”), Okla.Stat. tit. 57, §§ 570-576, unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christopher Shifrin v. Larry Fields, and State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Floyd John W. Aaron v. Larry A. Fields State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Paul Miranda v. David Walters Larry A. Fields State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- William Kosman v. Tom R. Kindt, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994