Williams v. Board of County Commissioners
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice McKINNON
¶85 In my opinion, the Court today fails to distinguish between a zoning regulation and a statute that enables zoning to take place in the first instance. The latter does not implicate considerations of an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority, while the former may. In failing to make a distinction between enabling provisions of the zoning statute and its substantive provisions, the Court has declared unconstitutional a condition precedent to zoning which the Legislature, as representatives of its citizens, determined was proper to have. We tell the Legislature and Montana…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.