Winn v. State

Sears, Justice.

Appellant Tyrone Winn appeals his convictions for murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, and illegal firearm possession,1 claiming the jury’s verdicts were not supported by the evidence and *483that the prosecutor engaged in cross-examination so inflammatory and prejudicial as to deny appellant his right to a fair trial. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the jury’s verdicts are supported by the evidence of record. We also find that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of a defense witness was proper in light of evidence suggesting that there may have been an attempt to…