Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Manchester Development Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 1, 1945No. Civ. A. No. 1342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum of Decision filed in Bowles v. Westbrook Defense Homes, D.C., 61 F.Supp. 172, the mandatory injunction sought by the plaintiff must be granted here.

The argument pressed by this defendant, that money retained in trust is not retained within the meaning of the regulation, is not persuasive. A trust relationship to the deposit must have been expected by the administrator in a substantial percentage of security deposit cases, from the very nature and purpose of the transaction, and any intention to omit those cases from the general…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. Westbrook Defense Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scala v. RuchlamerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API