Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Honeywell International, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 8, 2017No. Civil Case Number 3:16-cv-00543 (VLB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKTS. 44, 45]

Hon. Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is about the decision of Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) to terminate Plaintiffs retirees’ full medical coverage benefits. Plaintiffs David Kelly, Richard Norko, Annette Dobbs, and Peter Dellolio (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are retired union workers and a surviving spouse who allege that the termination of such benefits constitutes an anticipatory breach of the collective-bargaining agreement; a violation of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Cason v. National Football League Players AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  3. Pacheco v. Honeywell, Int'l Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. Xerox Corporation v. Local 14A, Rochester Regional Joint Board, Xerographic Division Workers UnitedDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API