Legal Opinion

Mackle v. Mackle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1980No. 80-415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

On the basis of Section 733.104(1), Florida Statutes (1979), the trial judge dismissed this action for fraud allegedly committed during his lifetime upon Elliott Mackle, the decedent of the plaintiff-personal representative, because the complaint was filed more than one year after his death. This was error.

Section 733.104(1) provides:

Suspension of statutes of limitation in favor of the personal representative-(1) If a person entitled to bring an action dies before the expiration of the *1082time limited for the commencement of the action and the cause of action survives,1 the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sammis v. JamesSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  2. Genslinger v. New Illinois Athletic ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Poulos v. VordermeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Wimpey v. SanchezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Harris v. EichelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Prevish v. Northwest Medical Center—Oil City CampusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API