Legal Opinion

Cornish v. Frees

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. Action to foreclose a mortgage. The principal facts are stated in the opinion. The mortgage in suit contained no express covenants. The plaintiff appeals frpm a judgment dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.

This action is to foreclose a mortgage upon the S. W. J of the S. W. £ of section 16, township 17,-range 15 E., in Winnebago county, Wis., executed by the defendant JR. W. Frees to one Angel B. Frees, on the 17th day of June, 1869, to secure the payment of the sum of $400, $200 of which was to be paid December 1,1872, and $200, December 1, 1873, without interest, of which the plaintiff has become the owner. The following are substantially the facts:

A. B. Frees, the father, entered into possession of said premises in 1852. Alpheus O. Frees, his son, became the owner of the same by patent from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pier v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Moore v. CordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  3. West v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Maxon v. AyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Truesdell v. RhodesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brokaw v. OgleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. S. L. Sheldon Co. v. MayersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Brown v. CohnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Miles v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  5. Fox v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API