Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1981No. 43033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Pursuant to a motion for a new trial, movant was retried, convicted by a jury of possession of a Schedule I Controlled Substance (heroin) and sentenced to five years imprisonment. On direct appeal, the conviction was upheld in State v. Riley, 583 S.W.2d 751 (Mo.App.1979). Movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion. The motion was denied. Movant appeals.

Movant asserts error in that the trial court refused to consider a second motion to suppress evidence pursuant to the grant of his motion for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. State v. RileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary Leon Riley v. Donald Wyrick, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. State v. RileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API