Legal Opinion

Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Windham

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 17, 1988No. Civ. A. No. B-87-00015-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the court is Windham’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision to strike the counterclaim asserted by Windham against Continental, which appears at Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago v. Windham, 668 F.Supp. 578 (E.D.Tex.1987). The facts of this case are fully set out in 668 F.Supp. 578, and will not be repeated here.

Having fully considered the motion papers and arguments of counsel, the court is of the opinion that it correctly decided to strike Windham’s counterclaim. However, the court deems it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. WindhamDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. First National Bank of Akron (In Re Hoffman)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
  2. Sanders v. First National Bank in Great BendDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API