Legal Opinion

Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Pesso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 9, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover dam*517ages for the defendants’ allegedly wrongful possession of portions of the plaintiffs’ property, the defendants David Nussbaum and Robin Nussbaum appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated June 19, 1995, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and for a judgment declaring that they are the rightful owners of the disputed property by adverse possession.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Brand v. PrinceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Van Valkenburgh v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Shinnecock Hills & Peconic Bay Realty Co. v. AldrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Rusoff v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MAG Associates, Inc. v. SDR Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Mee Wah Chan v. Y & Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Rote v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Eskenazi v. SloatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Fitzgerald v. ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API