Turner v. Oxford Management Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Rodney Turner and Evelyn Hasouris-Tur-ner’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs [Doc. #42], Defendant Oxford Management Services, Inc. (“OMS”) has responded [Doc. # 48] and Plaintiffs have replied [Doc. # 52], OMS does not dispute that Plaintiffs are entitled to recovery of some fees and expenses; OMS only disputes the amount Plaintiffs seek. Upon review of the parties’ submissions, all pertinent matters of record, and applicable law, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs’ Motion should be granted in part…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richardson v. Tex-Tube Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Burgos Ruiz v. DNC Construction, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
- Equis Equine, LLC v. RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2020