Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

La Notte, Inc. v. New Way Gourmet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1986No. 8621SC347Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge COZORT

concurs in part and dissents in part.

I dissent with the portion of the majority opinion granting a new trial for defendants on the issue of the defendants’ counterclaim and third party claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices. In my opinion the defendants waived the right to have certain factual issues determined by the jury because they failed to properly demand their submission to the jury. In Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc., and Merico, Inc., 288 N.C. 213, 217 S.E. 2d 566 (1975), the Supreme Court held that, *487“the right to have an issue of fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Wright v. American General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API