Employment Security Commission v. Magma Copper Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a final order of the Superior Court of Pinal County reversing a determination by the Employment Security Commission that claimants, Francisco Ruiz, Gumercindo Provencio and Jose M. Lugo, were entitled to unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 23-771 to 23-790 (1956). Presented here is the question whether a worker, forced to retire on pension at age 68 or above at the instance of his employer but according to the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement “has left work voluntarily without good cause in connection with his employment”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Moen v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- St. Joe Paper Company v. GautreauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Redd v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- STATE HOSPITAL, JAMESTOWN v. North Dakota Employment Security BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Forsman v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.