Legal Opinion

Pace v. Cirrus Design Corporation

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 13, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00685Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION GLEN PACE PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-685-KHJ-MTP CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are Defendants Cirrus Design Corporation and Apteryx, Inc.’s [75, 155] Motions for Sanctions Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1927

against Plaintiff Glen Pace’s counsel, Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies both [75, 155] Motions, but it imposes a $15,000 penalty on Ferrell sua sponte as sanctions for violating Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2). I. Background…

2Cases cited28 opinions

Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
Brenda Curtis and Alvin Williamson v. Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc. And Citicorp SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.