State v. Braaten
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Timothy G. Braaten appeals from the district court order relinquishing jurisdiction over Braaten after he served a period of retained jurisdiction. Braaten contends that the district court violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution by basing its decision on Braaten’s indigence.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Braaten pleaded guilty to sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1506. The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years with one and one-half years determinate and retained jurisdiction for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Jess Wade YostIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016