Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chatman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 3, 2000No. Record 992706PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

In this appeal, we address a question of first impression in this Commonwealth, whether a 13-year-old juvenile has either a constitu*565tional or statutory right to assert an insanity defense at the adjudicatory phase of a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Because we conclude that a juvenile does not have that right in such proceedings under either the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the statutes of this Commonwealth, we will reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the availability of the insanity defense in such juvenile proceedings is essential to due process.

M…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grattan v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. White v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Austin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  4. Pannell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. D.L.G. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API