Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Fuciarelli

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 26, 2016No. S15G1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Chief Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Fuciarelli v. McKinney, 333 Ga. App. 577 (773 SE2d 852) (2015), to determine whether it correctly held that the Georgia Taxpayer Protection Against False Claims Act, OCGA § 23-3-120 et seq., does not require the Attorney General to approve taxpayer retaliation claims brought under subsection (1) of the Act. Because the plain language of the statute requires the Attorney General to approve a taxpayer retaliation claim prior to filing suit, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Plaintiff Alfred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Humthlett v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Judicial Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLOSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. OPENSIDED MRI OF ATLANTA, LLC v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DOMINGUE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. MAYS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. DOMINGUE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. Eric Schumacher v. City of RoswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Fuciarelli v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API