Legal Opinion

Sibley v. . Townsend

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeesoN, J.

The question involved: Did R. Walter Townsend forfeit his life estate in the lands referred to in the complaint by reason of his failure to redeem said lands within twelve months after they had been sold for taxes, as provided in section 7982, Consolidated Statutes? We think so.

O. S., 7982, is as follows: “Every person shall be liable for the taxes assessed or charged upon the property or estate, real or personal, or which he is tenant for life. If any tenant for life of real estate shall suffer the same to be sold for taxes by reason of his neglect or refusal to pay the taxes thereon, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Logan v. . GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Crandall v. . ClemmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Cooper v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API