Anacomp, Inc. v. Smith Barney, Inc. (In Re Kalvar Microfilm, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HELEN S. BALICK, Chief Judge.
Anacomp, Inc. has restructured pursuant to a confirmed Chapter 11 plan. Smith Barney, a financial advisor, believes that plan is based upon services it performed for Ana-comp pre-petition and that it is entitled to certain advisory fees. Anacomp, however, asserts in this adversary proceeding that Smith Barney is barred from seeking these fees. The central question in this adversary is whether the plan phrase “any unsecured claim arising from or with respect to ... the rendition of services to the debtors prior to the petition date”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ruttenberg v. Davidge Data Systems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Century Glove, Inc. v. Iselin (In Re Century Glove, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Winston v. Mezzanine Investments, L.P.New York Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Nutritional Sourcing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008