Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Gregory A. Lemaire, Debtor. Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. Lemaire

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1990No. 88-5275Published

1Dissent

MAGILL, Circuit Judge,

with whom LAY, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, join, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. Although it purports to consider the totality of the circumstances and give due deference to the bankruptcy court’s credibility determinations, the majority ultimately relies on its own view of “public policy” to hold clearly erroneous the bankruptcy court’s finding that LeMaire proposed his plan in good faith. I reject the idea that this court’s own policy preference is a legitimate basis for reversing the bankruptcy court’s decision.

I

Despite the disclaimer that its…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Lines v. FrederickSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API