Hagen v. State

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Daniel T. Hagen appeals from his convictions at a jury trial of attempted rape and first-degree terroristic threatening, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty-five and four years, respectively, in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions for a directed verdict of acquittal as to each charge and, alternatively, that convicting him of both offenses violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. We affirm.

A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the…