Legal Opinion
Ross v. Alabama Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 20, 1998No. 2971019Published
1Per curiam
Dr. Donald D. Ross and Dr. Donald D. Ross, Jr. (“the Rosses”), were charged by the Alabama Board of Chiropractic Examiners (“the Board”) with violations of Ala.Code 1975, § 34-24-166(b)(16), and Rule 190-X-5-.04(3)(q)l. and Rule 190-X-5-.04(3)(b) of the Rules and Regulations governing the practice of chiropractic in Alabama.
The alleged violations were based on conduct related to an advertisement published in the 1996 BellSouth telephone directory for the city of Huntsville. The first alleged violation concerned the use of the phrase “Consultation @ No Charge,” in the published advertisement,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Alabama Renal Stone Inst v. A.S.H.C.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.