Legal Opinion

Hiigel v. General Motors Corporation

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 9, 1976No. C-548Published

1Opinion of the Court

544 P.2d 983 (1975)

Fred HIIGEL, Petitioner,

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. C-548.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

December 15, 1975.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Clarification February 9, 1976.

H. D. Reed, Denver, for petitioner.

Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Randall Weeks, Charles D. Calvin, Denver, for respondent General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div.

Williams, Trine & Greenstein, P. C., LeRoy D. Warkentine, Charles E. Williams, Boulder, for respondents, Aspen Coach Corp. and Eldon Martin, d/b/a Martin Motor Co.

GROVES, Justice.

This is a products liability case in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API