Matter of Fiore v. O'Connell
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
It is settled that the courts will not disturb the exercise of administrative discretion vested in the State Liquor Authority by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law unless the action complained of be deemed arbitrary or capricious. (See Matter of Glintenkamp v. O’Connell, 296 N. Y. 806, affg. 271 App. Div. 795; Matter of Roccaforte v. O’Connell, 296 N. Y. 938, affg. 271 App. Div. 831; Matter of Watinsky v. O’Connell, 297 N. Y. 552, affg. 271 App. Div. 973; Matter of Finn v. O’Connell, 297 N. Y. 607, affg. 271 App. Div. 896.)' In this case, a license was issued to the veteran King after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of Glintenkamp v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Roccaforte v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Watinsky v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Finn v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by25 opinions
- Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Rochester Colony, Inc. v. HostetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Willmont Liquors, Inc. v. RohanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Hub Wine & Liquor Co. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Giovatto v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.