Legal Opinion

State v. Ruff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1981No. 42347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for assault with intent to do great bodily harm without malice aforethought. The defendant waived his right to a jury. We affirm.

Ruff claims the verdict was not supported by the evidence in that the court failed to take into account the evidence of self-defense and defense of another. In a court tried criminal case the court’s finding has the force and effect of a jury verdict. -Hence, we will affirm that finding if it is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Ore, 567 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Mo.App.1978). We accept the state’s evidence, together…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. OldhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GiffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. IsomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. JohnstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BlountMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API