State v. Ruff
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Presiding Judge.
Appeal from a conviction for assault with intent to do great bodily harm without malice aforethought. The defendant waived his right to a jury. We affirm.
Ruff claims the verdict was not supported by the evidence in that the court failed to take into account the evidence of self-defense and defense of another. In a court tried criminal case the court’s finding has the force and effect of a jury verdict. -Hence, we will affirm that finding if it is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Ore, 567 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Mo.App.1978). We accept the state’s evidence, together…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. OldhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GiffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. IsomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. JohnstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BlountMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.