Boatmen's Bank of St. Louis v. Fritzlen
District Court, D. Kansas
Action by the Boatmen’s Bank of St. Louis against D. G. Fritzlen and others, on exception to the answer of defendants Fritzlen.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
Complainant presents its amended bill of complaint to foreclose a mortgage on real property executed by defendants Fritzlen, for an accounting, and decree for amount due from defendant D. G. Fritzlen to complainant thereunder. Defendants Fritzlen have answered this bill, and complainant has taken certain exceptions thereto, whith have been argued and submitted for decision.
The first exception to be noticed arises on the following state of facts, pleaded in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the answer in defense of this suit: That on November 15, 1889, defendant D. G. Fritzlen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re T. H. Bunch Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1910
- Blaine County National Bank v. TimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- In re JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
- Bessire & Co. v. Corn Products Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Andresen v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1932