Legal Opinion

Schoultz v. Eckardt Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 25, 1904No. 14,996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Acadia; Conrad De Baillon, Judge. Action by George A. Schoultz against the Eckardt Manufacturing Company, Limited, to recover for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

Plaintiff was an experienced workman, of 15 years’ standing. He was molder and planer foreman, and in that capacity had charge of the workmen, machinery, etc., on one of the floors of defendant’s sash and door factory. He states that his further duty was “to fix belts and keep the machines in running order.” He had been in defendant’s employ some 14 months, discharging those duties, when he was called upon to mend one of the belts of one of the saw tables, and had four of his fingers cut off in attempting to do the work. As soon as his hand got well, he went back to his same work in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. New Orleans & C. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Jenkins v. Maginnis Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sulzberger Sons Co. of Okla. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Jones v. Jahncke Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Davis v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API