Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dermott Special School District v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 17, 1972No. 5-5910Published

1DissentConley Byrd, Justice

The real question here is whether income from the collectors office can be used to support valid sheriff’s office expenses. The issue arises because of Article 19 §23 which provides:

“No officer of this State, nor any county, city or town, shall receive, directly or indirectly, for salary, fees and perquisites more than five thousand dollars net profits per annum in par funds, and any and all sums in excess of this amount shall be paid into the State, county, city or town treasury as shall hereafter be directed by appropriate legislation.”

Admittedly Sheriff Brown complied with the provisions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. County Board of Education v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Falconer v. ShoresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  4. Crowell v. BarhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Gray v. MathenySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API