Legal Opinion

Claytor v. Tricarichi, 92745 (3-2-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 2009No. 92745UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} On February 3, 2009, the petitioner, Justin Claytor, commenced this mandamus action against the respondent, Carla Tricarichi, a private attorney, to compel her to give him the trial transcripts in State ofOhio v. Justin Claytor, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-206272. Claytor asserts that Tricarichi has possession of the transcript and that, pursuant to the legal principle that an indigent appellant is entitled to a free transcript, Tricarichi has the duty to give him the transcript. For the following reasons, this court denies the application for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Grahek v. McCafferty, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sine v. SaffoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Bryant v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API