Legal Opinion

Barringer v. . the People

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The counsel for the people insists that the judgment is conclusive against the plaintiff in error as to the facts, and that we cannot review the case upon the evidence. But the position is not well taken. Where the trial in the special sessions is before the magistrate, without a jury, thecertiorari to the supreme court may require the return of the evidence for the consideration of the superior tribunal, though it is otherwise where there has been a trial by jury. (2 R.S., 717, §§ 42, 43, 44, 46, 49; Vanderwerker v. The People, 5Wend., 530; Son v. The People, 12 id., 344; Alkenbrack v. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vanderwerker v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Alkenbrack v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barton v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  2. McPherson v. RockwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API