Legal Opinion · Dissent

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Willbanks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1909Published

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. February 17, 1908.

1DissentAtkinson, J.

The deed from the plaintiff to the defendant was not set out, and the only means of ascertaining its character is by referring to the general allegations in the petition. *19From them it appears that a “right of way for the construction of a railroad” through plaintiff’s land was conveyed. Considering the purpose of the grant, “right of way” should be construed as referring to an easement over plaintiff’s land, rather than to a grant of the land itself. The case of the East Ala. Ry. Co. v. Doe ex dem. Visscher, 114 U. S. 340 (5 Sup. Ct. 869, 29 L. ed. 136), involved the construction of a deed,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Gaston v. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Brown v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Douglass v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API