Legal Opinion
Marriage of Pea v. Pea
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1986No. 49A02-8602-CV-47PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Respondent-appellant Dawn Krzynowek (Dawn) appeals the trial court's order granting the petition of appellee-petitioner Andrew Bruce Pea (Bruce) for modification of custody of the parties' minor son, Andrew Ryan Pea (Ryan), claiming the trial court's decision to modify its prior custody order constitutes an abuse of discretion in that the change of custody is not supported by the evidence.
We reverse.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the trial court's judgment reveal that the marriage of Dawn and Bruce was dissolved on October 19, 1981. Dawn was awarded custody…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marshall v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Schrenker v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Whitman v. WhitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Marriage of Poret v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Marriage of Barnett v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sangralea Boys Fund, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1997
- Inman v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Board of Trustees v. GrannanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Grubnich v. RennerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- State Employees' Appeals Commission v. BarclayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.