State v. Lindley
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Martin Court of Common Pléas.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Prosecution for keeping a gaming house. The charge in the affidavit and information was that “oh the 27th of July, 1848, and on divers other days and times before said day, Jacob B. Bindley did unlawfully erect, continue, and maintain a common gaming house, at,” &c.
The defendant was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and a jury was impatineled to try the issue.
At this point, the defendant moved to quash the information, and alleged the following fad s, as the ground of *431his motion, viz., that the defendant had already been tried on an information filed on the same day as that for keeping and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by18 opinions
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. McAninchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.