Legal Opinion

In re King's Will

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 15, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In the matter of the judicial settlement of the account of the executors of Charlotte E. King. Decree rendered.

1Opinion of the Court

HEATON, S.

On this judicial settlement the executors claim as assets of the estate six bank books and four bonds, while such bonds and two bank books are claimed by Miss Amelia E. Haswell, one by Joseph M. Haswell, one by Charles W. Gunnison, one by Mrs. Emma A. Harvey, and one by Harriet J. Warren, all of whom are residuary legatees and parties to this accounting. These claims are made upon *280the ground that the testatrix in her lifetime set apart the sums of money so deposited and such bonds as trusts for the use and benefit of such persons. Evidence of a large number of witnesses was taken in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API