Legal Opinion

Shane v. Johnson

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 29, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, Vice Chancellor:

The sole question in this case is whether or not certain items of cash are to be distributed by the executor under Item Three, the residuary clause of the will of testatrix.

Testatrix, after making two specific bequests of jewelry and clothing, provided as follows:

“Item Three: I order, direct, authorize and empower my said Executor to sell all of the rest, residue and remainder of my property, real, personal and mixed, at private or public sale, within one year after my death, and for whatever price or prices he deems fit; and I order and direct my said Executor to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Walls v. WallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Small v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shane v. JohnsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  2. Bank of Delaware v. HarrisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  3. Bank of Delaware v. HarrisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API