Kurtz v. Kurtz

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), dated January 9, 1987, as granted the plaintiff husband’s motion to the extent, inter alia, of directing her to serve an answer, *616directing the parties to proceed to trial, and enjoining the defendant from proceeding with an action for divorce in California.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied in its entirety.

Contrary to the conclusion of the…