Legal Opinion

Museus v. Geyer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1954No. File 9429PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

The action is on a promissory note of defendant dated July 5, 1952 in the principal sum of $501.45 payable to the Servu Realty Company. The 'complaint alleges that plaintiffs are holders in due course. The answer denies that allegation, and avers that the note was given without consideration under promises by Abe Ogdie, the president of Servu Realty Company, that it would not be negotiated and he would pay it out of his drawing account. A verdict was directed by the trial court for plaintiffs at the close of the testimony. After hearing on an application of defendant the court vacated the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaines v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Larsen v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Corsica State Bank v. HeezenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Plucker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byre v. WieczorekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Piper v. Barber Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. JH LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mueller v. TrudellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. BowersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API