Legal Opinion

Readenour v. Motors Insurance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1956No. 22313PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEW, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff brought' this action in two counts. In the first count he sought to reform the insurance policy sued on so as to include a mortgage clause as if attached thereto, and in the second count he asked for damages Under the policy for the loss of his combine harvesting machine by fire, including attorneys’ fees and $250 for vexatious refusal to pay the loss. On the application of defendant Motors Insurance Corporation, the court permitted it to inter-plead the Farley State -Bank of Farley, Missouri, as a party defendant and to file a . third party petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Harper v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Hauser v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Moreland v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Readenour v. Motors Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. City of St. Peters v. Kodner Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API