Patrick v. Perales

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by granting respondent Perales’ motion to dismiss the petition as to him, and by granting respondent Krauskopf s motion to dismiss the petition to the extent that it pertains to the denial of petitioner’s application for a medical subsidy. As so modified, the order should be affirmed, with costs to petitioners.

We reject respondent Krauskopfs contention that the petition for the adoption maintenance subsidy should be dismissed as time barred under CPLR 217. The communication dated December 18, 1975 from the…