United States v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellee' recovered judgment on a contract of war risk insurance upon the ground that she became totally and permanently disabled while the policy was in force. The sole question on this appeal is whether or not there is substantial evidence that she was totally and permanently disabled at the time her policy lapsed August 1, 1919.
The appellee served as a trained nurse in the military service of the United States from March 28, 1918 to the date of her discharge February 3, 1919.
'The evidence of the appellee supports the conclusion that during her service and at the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. FlippenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. SorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Julian v. FolsomDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. DupreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Burak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.