Legal Opinion

Bill Greever Corp. v. Tazewell National Bank & Citizens Bank

Tazewell County Circuit Court

Decided January 16, 1997No. Case No. (Law) CL94000100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Keary R. Williams

I have now read and reread the pleadings, responsive pleadings, motions, memorandum and responding memorandum, as well as the transcript and argument previously conducted in my chambers some time ago and render my opinion as follows.

A Motion for Summary Judgment will fail if there is a genuine issue of material fact. PilcmdCorp. v. League Const. Co., 238 Va. 187, 380 S.E.2d 652 (1989). “Upon considering a Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court must rule, as a matter of law, on the sufficiency of the evidence; it does not weigh the evidence as a finder of fact.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Charles E. Brauer Co. v. NationsBank of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  3. Sure-Snap Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Glass v. GlassSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Wright v. CastlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muir v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API